Veo 3.1 vs Wan 2.6
Side-by-side facts for two AI video models available on Piooy. Data is sourced directly from the Piooy model registry — no vendor-supplied marketing numbers. Last refreshed automatically every 24 hours.
| Attribute | Veo 3.1 | Wan 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google DeepMind | Alibaba Tongyi |
| Supported scenes | text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video | text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video |
| Aspect ratios | Auto, 16:9, 9:16 | — |
| Resolutions | — | 720p, 1080p |
| Clip duration (s) | 5 | 5, 10, 15 |
| Max prompt length | 3,000 chars | 5,000 chars |
| Max reference images | — | — |
| Cheapest generation | 150 credits | 80 credits |
| Capabilities |
|
|
Veo 3.1 pricing
Credits per generation, read from the Piooy pricing engine.
| Configuration | Credits |
|---|---|
| text-to-video, 5s | 150 |
| image-to-video, 5s | 160 |
Wan 2.6 pricing
Credits per generation, read from the Piooy pricing engine.
| Configuration | Credits |
|---|---|
| text-to-video @ 720p, 5s | 80 |
| text-to-video @ 1080p, 5s | 110 |
| text-to-video @ 720p, 10s | 150 |
| text-to-video @ 1080p, 10s | 215 |
| text-to-video @ 720p, 15s | 220 |
| text-to-video @ 1080p, 15s | 320 |
| image-to-video @ 720p, 5s | 80 |
| image-to-video @ 1080p, 5s | 115 |
| image-to-video @ 720p, 10s | 150 |
| image-to-video @ 1080p, 10s | 220 |
| image-to-video @ 720p, 15s | 220 |
| image-to-video @ 1080p, 15s | 325 |
Which one should you pick?
Choose Veo 3.1 when video-to-video / reference is the priority. Choose Wan 2.6 when multi-shot composition matters more. Both models are available inside the same Piooy account — you can switch between them at any time.