Kling 2.6 vs Veo 3.1
Side-by-side facts for two AI video models available on Piooy. Data is sourced directly from the Piooy model registry — no vendor-supplied marketing numbers. Last refreshed automatically every 24 hours.
| Attribute | Kling 2.6 | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Kuaishou | Google DeepMind |
| Supported scenes | text-to-video, image-to-video | text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 | Auto, 16:9, 9:16 |
| Resolutions | — | — |
| Clip duration (s) | 5, 10 | 5 |
| Max prompt length | 1,000 chars | 3,000 chars |
| Max reference images | — | — |
| Cheapest generation | 55 credits | 150 credits |
| Capabilities |
|
|
Kling 2.6 pricing
Credits per generation, read from the Piooy pricing engine.
| Configuration | Credits |
|---|---|
| text-to-video, 5s | 55 |
| text-to-video, 10s | 110 |
| image-to-video, 5s | 76 |
| image-to-video, 10s | 140 |
Veo 3.1 pricing
Credits per generation, read from the Piooy pricing engine.
| Configuration | Credits |
|---|---|
| text-to-video, 5s | 150 |
| image-to-video, 5s | 160 |
Which one should you pick?
Choose Kling 2.6 when audio generation is the priority. Choose Veo 3.1 when video-to-video / reference matters more. Both models are available inside the same Piooy account — you can switch between them at any time.